Outcomes:
We look forward to locating a responsive judiciary to end the deadly epidemic of women and children killed each year as a result of ending a relationship.
Killer judges however, are not limited to family court, as was recently demonstrated in Washington's criminal court in King County with Judge, Brian Gain. Six days earlier, (and after the suspect's aunt had filed for a protection order) Gain was made aware of the defendant's mental status, but failed the public in general, and; the now dead woman, in particular.
Thus proving Killer judges exist in all courts. They are not limited family court, although by and large, it's family court judges who are contributing to the death of our most vulnerable.
Until mainstream media examines the relationship between ineffective non-profits and killer judges, the general public should become aware of the risks awaiting them in family and other courts.
Additionally, litigants should take steps to protect themselves to include boycotting the court rooms of judges who get people killed as did California's, Judge Morgan. We suggest California litigants read about CCP 170.6 should they not want Judge Morgan to hear their case. (Other states have other codes.).
We feel Judge Morgan's court room should be as dark as the inside of Danielle Keller's casket.
This seems to be the right action as Judge Morgan clearly represents a danger to the public and should not be in a position to cause further death or injury.
However and in fairness, given Justice Ronald George's track record, and that of the U.S. Supreme Court in Castle Rock vs. Gonzales, this is only a first step.
Which is why litigants should protect themselves and vote with their feet when it comes to judges featured here.
Doing so means the life you save could be your own.